ETSU Bureau of Business and Economic Research

 

Tri-Cities Labor Market Report

 

East Tennessee State University + Third Quarter 2016 + College of Business and Technology

 

THE METROPOLITAN AREA (CSA)

 

               Labor market conditions continued to improve in the Tri-Cities metro area over the summer months.  Employment data from both the Current Population Survey (CPS) and the Current Employment Survey (CES) show job gains.  In the household-based Current Population Survey, metro employment levels increased 2.9% to 217,845.  Unemployment fell 9.0% to 12,265, reducing the jobless rate to 5.3% (compared to 6.0% in 2015 and 7.0% in 2014).  The overall labor force expanded by 2.2% to 230,109.  The establishment-based Current Employment Survey shows payroll employment rising to 201,267, or 1.0% above 2015 levels.

               Among the twelve regional industry sectors, the CES data show employment levels higher in seven, lower in three, and unchanged in two sectors (compared to higher in seven, lower in three, and unchanged in two during the second quarter).  Job growth was led by leisure & hospitality, retail trade, professional & business services, and education & health.  Smaller job gains were reported by government, financial services, and transport & utilities.  Job declines occurred in manufacturing, information services, and wholesale trade.  Employment was unchanged in construction, and wholesale trade.

 

                  Labor Force      Employment           Unemployment
        Period    Level  Y-Y%Ch    Level  Y-Y%Ch    Level  Y-Y%Ch   Rate_
         2007    244,704   0.45   234,109   0.92    10,595  -8.87   4.33
         2008    247,668   1.21   233,447  -0.28    14,222  34.22   5.74
         2009    247,965   0.12   224,752  -3.72    23,213  63.22   9.36
         2010    239,478  -3.42   217,213  -3.35    22,265  -4.08   9.30
         2011    242,010   1.06   221,426   1.94    20,584  -7.55   8.51
         2012    237,563  -1.84   219,319  -0.95    18,244 -11.37   7.68
         2013    233,381  -1.76   215,472  -1.75    17,910  -1.83   7.67
         2014    228,229  -2.21   213,146  -1.08    15,083 -15.78   6.61
         2015    225,614  -1.15   212,301  -0.40    13,312 -11.74   5.90
         13:1    235,444  -1.27   216,235  -1.50    19,209   1.43   8.16
         13:2    235,362  -1.38   216,972  -1.51    18,391   0.15   7.81
         13:3    233,137  -1.60   215,122  -1.47    18,016  -3.05   7.73
         13:4    229,582  -2.81   213,559  -2.54    16,023  -6.26   6.98
         14:1    229,344  -2.59   213,561  -1.24    15,783 -17.84   6.88
         14:2    228,956  -2.72   214,024  -1.36    14,932 -18.81   6.52
         14:3    228,561  -1.96   212,510  -1.21    16,051 -10.91   7.02
         14:4    226,054  -1.54   212,487  -0.50    13,566 -15.33   6.00
         15:1    225,366  -1.73   211,250  -1.08    14,116 -10.56   6.26
         15:2    226,390  -1.12   212,969  -0.49    13,421 -10.12   5.93
         15:3    225,159  -1.49   211,687  -0.39    13,472 -16.07   5.98
         15:4    225,539  -0.23   213,298   0.38    12,241  -9.77   5.43
         16:1    227,139   0.79   216,010   2.25    11,130 -21.16   4.90
         16:2    228,473   0.92   218,020   2.37    10,453 -22.11   4.58
         16:3    230,109   2.20   217,845   2.91    12,265  -8.96   5.33

 

THE TRI-CITIES

 

               All three cities saw higher employment levels in the third quarter, according to the household CPS data.  During the summer months, employment grew 3.8% in Johnson City, 3.4% in Kingsport, and 1.7% in Bristol.  On a year-to-year basis, unemployment fell 11.3% in Johnson City, 8.4% in Kingsport, and 4.9% in Bristol.  The unemployment rate was 5.2% in Bristol, 5.3% in Johnson City, and 5.5% in Kingsport (compared to the regional jobless rate of 5.3%).

 

Bristol TN-VA Urbanized Area Labor Market

 

                  Labor Force      Employment           Unemployment
        Period    Level  Y-Y%Ch    Level  Y-Y%Ch    Level  Y-Y%Ch   Rate_
         2007     32,481   0.22    31,055   0.38     1,426  -3.03   4.39
         2008     32,960   1.48    31,205   0.48     1,755  23.10   5.32
         2009     32,931  -0.09    29,962  -3.99     2,969  69.19   9.02
         2010     32,590  -1.03    29,745  -0.72     2,845  -4.19   8.73
         2011     33,078   1.50    30,424   2.28     2,654  -6.70   8.02
         2012     32,574  -1.53    30,204  -0.72     2,369 -10.73   7.27
         2013     32,125  -1.38    29,834  -1.22     2,291  -3.31   7.13
         2014     31,631  -1.54    29,629  -0.69     2,002 -12.61   6.33
         2015     31,109  -1.65    29,395  -0.79     1,714 -14.37   5.51
         13:1     32,240  -1.37    29,818  -1.20     2,422  -3.47   7.51
         13:2     32,353  -1.13    30,026  -1.03     2,327  -2.36   7.19
         13:3     32,162  -1.17    29,862  -0.90     2,299  -4.61   7.15
         13:4     31,746  -1.84    29,631  -1.77     2,115  -2.74   6.66
         14:1     31,843  -1.23    29,744  -0.25     2,099 -13.34   6.59
         14:2     31,807  -1.69    29,797  -0.76     2,010 -13.61   6.32
         14:3     31,645  -1.61    29,526  -1.13     2,120  -7.81   6.70
         14:4     31,228  -1.63    29,449  -0.62     1,779 -15.88   5.70
         15:1     31,135  -2.22    29,281  -1.56     1,854 -11.66   5.96
         15:2     31,219  -1.85    29,785  -1.05     1,735 -13.71   5.56
         15:3     30,991  -2.07    29,267  -0.88     1,724 -18.67   5.56
         15:4     31,092  -0.44    29,547   0.33     1,545 -13.18   4.97
         16:1     31,282   0.47    29,794   1.75     1,488 -19.76   4.76
         16:2     31,232   0.04    29,838   1.20     1,394 -19.62   4.46
         16:3     31,404   1.34    29,765   1.70     1,640  -4.90   5.22

 

Johnson City Urbanized Area Labor Market

 

                  Labor Force      Employment           Unemployment
        Period    Level  Y-Y%Ch    Level  Y-Y%Ch    Level  Y-Y%Ch   Rate_
         2007     60,977   1.53    58,372   1.96     2,605  -7.22   4.27
         2008     61,391   0.68    57,761  -1.05     3,629  39.30   5.91
         2009     61,505   0.19    55,868  -3.28     5,637  55.32   9.17
         2010     58,250  -5.29    52,830  -5.44     5,419  -3.86   9.30
         2011     58,715   0.80    53,683   1.61     5,033  -7.14   8.57
         2012     57,600  -1.90    53,244  -0.82     4,356 -13.44   7.56
         2013     56,220  -2.40    51,876  -2.57     4,344  -0.27   7.73
         2014     54,904  -2.34    51,279  -1.15     3,624 -16.58   6.60
         2015     54,611  -0.53    51,350   0.14     3,261 -10.02   5.97
         13:1     56,952  -1.65    52,315  -2.10     4,637   3.74   8.14
         13:2     56,698  -1.95    52,198  -2.28     4,500   2.09   7.94
         13:3     55,892  -2.30    51,489  -2.39     4,403  -1.25   7.88
         13:4     55,337  -3.69    51,501  -3.50     3,837  -6.15   6.93
         14:1     55,014  -3.40    51,291  -1.96     3,723 -19.71   6.77
         14:2     54,877  -3.21    51,298  -1.72     3,579 -20.47   6.52
         14:3     54,961  -1.67    51,045  -0.86     3,917 -11.05   7.13
         14:4     54,762  -1.04    51,484  -0.03     3,278 -14.57   5.99
         15:1     54,520  -0.90    51,126  -0.32     3,394  -8.84   6.23
         15:2     54,736  -0.26    51,435   0.27     3,301  -7.76   6.03
         15:3     54,506  -0.83    51,174   0.25     3,332 -14.92   6.11
         15:4     54,680  -0.15    51,664   0.35     3,016  -7.99   5.52
         16:1     54,955   0.80    52,344   2.38     2,611 -23.05   4.75
         16:2     55,624   1.62    53,128   3.29     2,496 -24.40   4.49
         16:3     56,087   2.90    53,130   3.82     2,957 -11.27   5.27

 

Kingsport Urbanized Area Labor Market

 

                  Labor Force      Employment           Unemployment
        Period    Level  Y-Y%Ch    Level  Y-Y%Ch    Level  Y-Y%Ch   Rate_
         2007     50,171  -0.34    48,115   0.34     2,056 -14.07   4.10
         2008     50,734   1.12    47,916  -0.41     2,818  37.08   5.55
         2009     51,046   0.62    46,333  -3.30     4,713  67.27   9.23
         2010     49,718  -2.60    45,094  -2.67     4,624  -1.90   9.30
         2011     50,328   1.23    46,045   2.11     4,284  -7.36   8.51
         2012     49,243  -2.16    45,449  -1.29     3,794 -11.42   7.71
         2013     48,413  -1.69    44,673  -1.71     3,739  -1.46   7.72
         2014     47,242  -2.42    44,104  -1.28     3,138 -16.07   6.64
         2015     46,623  -1.31    43,826  -0.63     2,797 -10.88   6.00
         13:1     48,822  -1.04    44,845  -1.26     3,977   1.48   8.15
         13:2     48,908  -1.19    45,038  -1.37     3,870   0.89   7.91
         13:3     48,464  -1.61    44,686  -1.52     3,777  -2.75   7.79
         13:4     47,456  -2.92    44,125  -2.69     3,332  -5.84   7.02
         14:1     47,472  -2.77    44,230  -1.37     3,241 -18.50   6.83
         14:2     47,495  -2.89    44,382  -1.45     3,112 -19.58   6.55
         14:3     47,353  -2.29    43,994  -1.55     3,359 -11.08   7.09
         14:4     46,648  -1.70    43,807  -0.72     2,841 -14.74   6.09
         15:1     46,490  -2.07    43,576  -1.48     2,915 -10.08   6.27
         15:2     46,842  -1.37    44,015  -0.83     2,827  -9.16   6.04
         15:3     46,563  -1.67    43,710  -0.65     2,852 -15.08   6.13
         15:4     46,595  -0.11    44,002   0.45     2,593  -8.71   5.57
         16:1     47,116   1.35    44,846   2.91     2,270 -22.11   4.82
         16:2     47,531   1.47    45,318   2.96     2,213 -21.74   4.66
         16:3     47,826   2.71    45,214   3.44     2,612  -8.44   5.46

 

THE UNITED STATES

 

               National labor market conditions improved again in the third quarter, according to both the household and payroll surveys.  Based on the CPS household data, national employment rose 1.8% to 152.1 million, while unemployment fell 2.7% to 8.0 million, and the jobless rate declined to 5.0% (compared to 5.2% in 2015 and 6.2% in 2014).  Employment levels have been rising for the past twenty-four quarters, and during nineteen of the last twenty quarters, the rate of job growth has remained above the critical one percent threshold, which is necessary to accommodate U.S. population expansion.

               Turning to the CES data, national payroll employment increased by 1.7% to 144.5 million in the July to September period.  Among the twelve national industry sectors, employment levels were higher in eleven and lower in one (compared to higher in eleven and lower in one during the second quarter).  The largest employment gains were in education & health, professional & business services, leisure & hospitality, retail trade, government, and financial services.  Smaller employment growth occurred in other services, mining & construction, transportation & utilities, wholesale trade, and information services.  Manufacturing suffered a small job loss in the third quarter.

 

                   Labor Force      Employment           Unemployment
         Period    Level  Y-Y%Ch    Level  Y-Y%Ch    Level  Y-Y%Ch   Rate_
          2007    153,124  1.12    146,047  1.12     7,078    1.10   4.62
          2008    154,287  0.76    145,362 -0.47     8,924   26.09   5.78
          2009    154,142 -0.09    139,878 -3.77    14,265   59.84   9.25
          2010    153,889 -0.16    139,064 -0.58    14,825    3.93   9.63
          2011    153,752 -0.09    139,648  0.42    14,104   -4.86   9.17
          2012    154,975  0.80    142,469  2.02    12,506  -11.33   8.07
          2013    155,389  0.27    143,929  1.02    11,460   -8.36   7.37
          2014    155,922  0.34    146,305  1.65     9,616  -16.09   6.17
          2015    157,130  0.77    148,833  1.73     8,296  -13.73   5.28
          13:1    154,679  0.46    142,180  1.07    12,499   -5.97   8.08
          13:2    155,854  0.49    144,332  1.19    11,521   -7.50   7.39
          13:3    156,234  0.40    144,758  1.23    11,477   -9.01   7.35
          13:4    154,790 -0.27    144,447  0.63    10,343  -11.32   6.68
          14:1    155,012  0.22    144,250  1.46    10,762  -13.90   6.94
          14:2    155,895  0.03    146,423  1.45     9,472  -17.79   6.08
          14:3    156,636  0.26    146,951  1.52     9,685  -15.61   6.18
          14:4    156,144  0.87    147,597  2.18     8,547  -17.36   5.47
          15:1    156,193  0.76    147,102  1.98     9,092  -15.52   5.82
          15:2    157,518  1.04    149,194  1.89     8,325  -12.11   5.28
          15:3    157,508  0.56    149,310  1.61     8,198  -15.35   5.21
          15:4    157,299  0.74    149,728  1.44     7,571  -11.42   4.81
          16:1    158,160  1.26    149,945  1.93     8,215   -9.65   5.19
          16:2    159,141  1.03    151,553  1.58     7,588   -8.85   4.77
          16:3    160,046  1.61    152,073  1.85     7,974   -2.74   4.98
          Note: Data are in thousands.

 

ANALYSIS

 

               Recent labor market patterns continued into the summer months.  All of the markets covered in this report again show higher employment, lower unemployment, and reduced jobless rates.  This positive picture is supported by both the household CPS data and the payroll CES data.

               At the national level, the CPS and CES data tell the same story - employment has steadily increased for the past six years.    However good this growth in jobs may have been, the annual one percent growth in population has added millions of potential workers to the national labor pool.

               If we were at true full employment, then the CPS household data would show 160.0 million Americans at work, but instead there were 152.1 million jobs in the third quarter.  If the missing 7.9 million workers are added into the labor force statistics as being unemployed, then the effective jobless rate is 9.8%, or about twice as large as the official rate of 5.0%.

               At the Tri-Cities regional level, the CPS and CES sources have not been consistent over recent years.  The CPS household data will typically show employment gains.  But during the annual benchmark revisions, the gains will be turned into losses.  In contrast, the CES payroll data has consistently shown employment growth, and revisions tend to be small.

               In the third quarter, payroll employment in the Consolidated Statistical Area was 1.0% above the same period in 2015.  In the Kingsport/Bristol MSA, payroll employment was up by 0.9%, while the Johnson City MSA saw 1.2% growth.  (The Tri-Cities Consolidated Statistical Area is composed of the Kingsport/Bristol MSA and the Johnson City MSA.).  Based on this continued employment growth in the national economy and in the regional economy, the Tri-Cities business outlook remains good.

 

Data Sources.  This report is based on two monthly data surveys from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS).  The data used for the labor market tables are based on the monthly survey of the homes where people live.  This survey is officially the Current Population Survey (CPS), but the term “household survey” is preferred by the BLS.  The CPS provides labor market information for the nation, states, metro areas, counties, and select cities.  The data used for employment by industry are based on the monthly survey of the places where people work.  This survey is officially the Current Employment Survey (CES), but the terms “establishment survey” or “payroll survey” are preferred by the BLS.  The CES provides payroll employment data for the nation, states, and metropolitan areas.  Industry definitions are based on the North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS).

 

Technical Note on the Labor Market Tables.  This report was prepared in November 2016, and is based upon the 2015 benchmark of the Current Population Survey, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS).  The labor markets for Bristol, Johnson City, and Kingsport are presented in terms of the U.S. Census Bureau concept of the urbanized area (UZA) which includes the core city and the contiguous urban fringe.  The urbanized area for each city is based upon demographic patterns from the 2010 Census of Population.  The data in this report are not adjusted for seasonality, so comparisons should be made on a year-to-year basis.

 

More information.  This report was prepared by Dr. F. Steb Hipple, Professor of Economics (Ret), and Research Associate (Ret), BBER.  Dr. Hipple will continue to prepare the labor market reports on an interim basis.  For more information, please contact Dr. Hipple c/o Department of Economics and Finance, Box 70686, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, Tennessee 37614.  Phone/Voicemail: 423-439-5304.  Fax: 423-439-8583.  E-Mail: hipples@etsu.edu .  Website: http://faculty.etsu.edu/hipples.