ENGL 4417/5417: Teaching English in High Schools
Dr. Phyllis Thompson
Office: 213 Burleson Hall
Office Hours: TR 9:45-11:15, 3:30-4:30, F 11-12noon, & by appointment
TEL: 439.5997; E: thompsop@etsu.edu
Course Description:
English 4417/4517: Teaching English in High Schools
presents methods of teaching secondary English.
Its aim is to provide experiences leading to the creation of a
dynamic classroom for effective teaching through focusing on issues in the
field as well as current theories about the teaching of writing, literature,
and language. This course is
geared toward individuals interested in becoming secondary English teachers.
As
we investigate the practical and the theoretical
issues related to English Language Arts pedagogy, we will practice the
different activities that teachers can do in secondary classes and, and very
importantly, interrogate why those activities are of value and how they help
students learn. In fact,
metacognition, i.e., thinking about how we think, is an integral and
crucial component of this class.
We will analyze the thinking that teenage learners perform as well as our
own processes of cognition. We
will consider issues related to contemporary English Language Arts
instruction. What are the content standards and how do they relate to good
teaching? How can we help
students improve their reading comprehension?
How can we inspire students to become lifelong lovers of literature
and reading? How can we help
students become better writers?
How do we scaffold in order to maximize student learning?
How do we become skilled and effective writers of curriculum?
These are some of the questions we will address during the semester.
This class provides an opportunity to begin making the transition
from student to teacher. By the
end of the course, you should be able to articulate your ideas about what an
effective teacher is and what an effective teacher does; you should also be
able to articulate who you are as a teacher in a formal statement of
teaching philosophy. English
4417/5417 is an Oral Intensive designated course.
Required Texts:
Burke, Jim.
Teacher's Essential Guide
Series: Classroom Management
Scholastic Teaching Resources (Theory an (January
1, 2008) ISBN-10: 043993446X,
ISBN-13: 978-0439934466
Carter, James Bucky.
Building Literacy Connections
with Graphic Novels: Page by Page, Panel by Panel.
National
Council of Teachers of English (April 3, 2007)
ISBN-10: 0814103928,
ISBN-13: 978-0814103920
Golden, John.
Golub, Jeffrey.
Activities for an Interactive Classroom.
National
Council of Teachers of English (August 1994)
ISBN-10: 0814100465,
ISBN-13: 978-0814100462
Jago, Carol.
Papers Papers Papers Heinemann (July 27,
2005)
ISBN-10: 0325008280,
ISBN-13: 978-0325008288
Somers, Albert B.
Teaching Poetry in High School
National Council of Teachers of English
(August 1999)
ISBN-10: 0814152899,
ISBN-13: 978-0814152898.
Tovani, Cris. I Read It, But I Don’t
Get It: Comprehension Strategies for Adolescent Readers.
Stenhouse Publishers (October 2000)
ISBN-10: 157110089X,
ISBN-13: 978-1571100894
Novel of your choice and 10 poems of your choice.
Learning Objectives:
Candidates will identify content standards and
explain how they relate to effective teaching.
Candidates will implement Mississippi Standards,
Competencies, and Objectives for the English Language Arts.
Candidates will articulate an informed perspective
on issues of professional concern.
Candidates will expand their exposure to
literature, which crosses lines of culture, race, ethnicity, religion,
class, sexual orientation, age, gender, and genre, and investigate resources
to identify authors, teaching tools, and current scholarship.
Candidates will understand the diversity of student
learner types and the relevance of cultural influences to learning styles.
Candidates will research for and respond critically
to primary and secondary source materials.
Candidates will learn about and practice strategies
that involve adolescents in reading, comprehending, and responding to
literature.
Candidates will learn about and practice strategies
that involve adolescents in writing as process.
Candidates will design an effective literature
lesson (with assessment instrument), which draws on a range of enrichment
materials that will engage students in active and authentic learning.
Candidates will design an effective writing lesson
(with assessment instrument), which draws on a range of enrichment materials
that will engage students in active and authentic learning.
Candidates will create a learning environment that
is sensitive to the needs of different learner types and fosters respect for
individual differences along lines of race, religion, ethnicity, culture,
gender, and sexual orientation.
Candidates will use technology to enhance
instruction.
Candidates will define education and develop a
personal philosophy for teaching literature.
Candidates will identify philosophical beliefs that
underscore pedagogical practices.
Candidates will test their assumptions and skills
about teaching through teaching a mini lesson and/or a full lesson and
reflect in writing on the strengths and weaknesses as well as validity/lack
of validity and effectiveness/ineffectiveness of those assumptions and those
skills.
Candidates will reflect on the effectiveness of
their individual lesson plans and overall unit plans (taking into
consideration issues including, but not limited to, assessment and
evaluation, diversity, student learner types, and classroom management) and
make suggestions about ways in which lessons and/or units could be improved.
Course Requirements:
Introductions
5%
The Art of Listening
5%
Statement of Teaching Philosophy
10%
Teaching Strategies that Work
10%
Mini-Lesson
10%
Teaching Demonstration
20%
Lesson Plan
Teaching
Reflection
Unit Plan
40%
Rationale
Course Syllabus
Schedule
Daily Plans (poem, novel, film or graphic novel, writing, technology)
Associated Handouts
Assessments with Rubrics
Book Set
Grading Scale:
A- - A (3.75-4.00) = 93-100
B- - B+ (2.75-3.74) = 85-92
C- - C+ (1.75-2.74) = 75-84
D- - D+ (0.75-1.74) = 65-74
F (Below .75) = 00-64
Breakdown of Grading Scale:
A
96-100
A- 93-95
B+
91-92
B
87-90
B-
85-86
C+
82-84
C 78-81
C-
75-77
D+
72-74
D
68-71
D-
65-67
F
64 and below
THE POLICY PAGE: EXECTATIONS, ADVICE, & GENERAL ACADEMIC ETIQUETTE
Please Note:
I encourage you to open yourself to new ideas, read all materials assigned
for this course, and participate actively in class discussions; however,
some texts may contain potentially offensive language, images, and/or ideas.
If, at any time, you become uncomfortable and feel you need to excuse
yourself, you may do so.
Attendance: My attendance policy is
simple: you have two absences, which you may take at any time; however, for
each absence over the second one, your daily grade (short writings) will be
dropped one letter grade.
If you are tardy, please note that it is your responsibility to see that I
have marked you present for that class period.
Do this immediately after the class period.
I will not make corrections to my roster after I leave the classroom.
If tardiness becomes habitual, I reserve the right to refuse changing my
roster. Bear in mind that class
attendance affects the quality of one’s work in a course and, ultimately,
the quality of one’s college degree.
The English Department does not distinguish between “excused” and
“unexcused” absences and, therefore, has established a maximum allowable
number of absences: no more than six
absences on MW and TR schedule.
Students exceeding this limit will receive an F or a W if
within the University policy on dropping a course.
Project Guidelines:
Unless otherwise noted, all assignments (homework and essays) should be
computer-printed, titled, paginated, and stapled/paper clipped.
The font should be Arial, Courier, or Times New Roman, 10 or
12-point; text should be double-spaced.
Final drafts should be proofread thoroughly.
Projects are due at the beginning of class on the designated date
unless otherwise stipulated.
Printer problems and other technical difficulties are not acceptable excuses
for failure to hand in a paper on time. To avoid such common problems, print
out and proofread the final draft of your paper well before the time the
paper is due. Absence on the day a paper is due is not an acceptable excuse;
however, if you have a legitimate reason for being unable to turn in a paper
on the due date, please raise your concerns in
advance of that date.
I will consider making accommodations for students whose requests
come in a week prior to a scheduled deadline.
After that time, the deadline is not negotiable.
Grammar, punctuation, spelling, and proper MLA documentation all
count. I will provide handouts
on the specific requirements of each assignment during class.
Late Work: If you must be absent from
class, please obtain class notes/assignments from another student before the
next class. Absence is not an
excuse for late work. Late
homework (i.e., short writing assignments, discussion starters, and
reflection cards) is not accepted for a grade.
If you must be absent and want credit for your homework, be sure that
I have the actual assignment in my hands before class begins.
I will accept homework directly from you, via e-submission, or
delivered by a friend as long as I have it in my hands before the class
period begins. In-class graded
assignments, workshops, and group work cannot be made up.
If you are absent, you will receive a 0 for those assignments.
Major projects (teaching demonstrations, annotated
bibliographies, and field guides) will be taken up at the beginning of the
class period on which they are due.
Projects that come in after that time will be considered late and
docked one letter grade per class day.
Plagiarism: Plagiarism will not be
tolerated and its consequences are serious.
Proven willful plagiarism will result in failure in the course and
may include dismissal from the university.
The MLA Handbook defines
plagiarism as repeating “as your own someone else's sentences, more or less
verbatim. . . . Other forms of
plagiarism include repeating someone else's particularly apt phrase without
appropriate acknowledgment, paraphrasing another person's argument as your
own, and presenting another's line of thinking . . . as though it were your
own” (MLA Handbook 597-600).
We will discuss plagiarism during class.
If you have additional questions, please see me, refer to your
Harbrace Handbook (597-600),
The MLA Handbook, and/or consult
with the WCC. If you use someone else’s ideas, be sure to cite your sources
accurately and distinguish his or her thoughts from your own. If you use
someone else’s words, be sure to place them in quotation marks and cite your
sources. See the most recent edition of the
MLA Handbook for Writers of Research Papers for guidance on citing
sources and other technical matters.
Office of Disability Services:
Conferencing:
Working directly with me is an
important part of this course. I
encourage you to drop by to discuss your ideas, your reading, your writing,
or even the day's weather. My
door is open.
Professional Classroom Etiquette:
1.
Arrive on time and prepared for class.
Punctuality will be your obligation as a teacher, begin preparing for
this professional responsibility now.
We all know that when students are tardy, the class discussion is
disrupted. Tardiness is also
detrimental to your success as a student since you miss the opening moments
of the class experience, announcements, changes to the syllabus,
distribution of handouts, etc.
2.
Please do not leave class early unless we have discussed this in advance of
the class meeting. Personal
business should be completed before or after class time.
3.
Please do not text message during my class.
Enough said.
4.
Be respectful of classmates and professor.
Practice sharing verbal space.
Practice active listening.
Avoid interrupting others while they are speaking.
Avoid talking with your neighbor while others are speaking.
You will want others to extend this courtesy to you when you have the
floor.
5.
You may bring a coffee or cold drink into the classroom; however, you may
not eat in this class unless the class as a whole decides to make a
particular class period a “Wunch” class, i.e., a working lunch, and there is
enough food for everyone.
6.
Participate actively.
Electronic Sources:
The ALAN Review—the journal for The Assembly
on Literature for Adolescents of the National Council of Teachers of English
(NCTE) covers YA literature, teaching, trends and current research.
http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/ALAN/ (see list of articles and
go to “findarticles.com” for articles from 2005-2007)
The Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy is the only literacy journal published exclusively
for teachers of older learners. Each issue offers practical,
classroom-tested ideas grounded in research and theory. Whether you work
with new, struggling, or skilled, readers, you’ll find something of interest
in JAAL.
http://www.reading.org/publications/journals/jaal/index.html
Literature Resource Center (LRC) provides access to
biographies, bibliographies, and critical analyses of more than 120,000
authors from every age and literary discipline.
http://go.galegroup.com/ps/?&u=tel_a_etsul&p=LitRC&v=2.1&authCount=1
Pedagogy—
Pedagogy
is an innovative journal that aims to build a new discourse around teaching
in English studies. Reversing the long history of marginalization of
teaching and the scholarship produced around it, it offers a forum for
critical reflection and spirited debate. The journal publishes articles by
senior scholars as well as more junior members of the profession, featuring
voices from many subdisciplines and institutions.
Pedagogy promises to stimulate new
and exciting developments for undergraduate and graduate instruction in
English studies. (available
through Project Muse)
Reading Online—a journal of K-12 practice
and research published by the International Reading Association.
http://www.readingonline.org/
Tennessee Department of Education—English
Language Arts Content Standards.
http://www.tennessee.gov/education/ci/cistandards2001/la/cilaprog912.htm
VOYA—Voice of
Youth Advocates or VOYA is the library magazine serving those who serve
young adults, and I recommend that you check it out, especially for its neat
book reviewing code.
This bimonthly journal addresses librarians, educators, and other
professionals who work with young adults and is the only magazine devoted
exclusively to the informational needs of teenagers.
VOYA’s mission is "to
identify the social myths that keep us from serving young people and replace
them with knowledge."
http://www.voya.com/
YALSA—Young
Adult Library Services Association, which archives their booklists for Best
YA fiction, Best YA fiction for reluctant readers, Best YA graphic novels,
and more.
http://www.ala.org/yalsa/booklists/quickpicks/
Related Sites:
PET (Project for Effective Teaching) Resources: bibliography of pedagogy
resources aimed to help the new teacher in his or her craft. Maintained by
50
Alternatives to Lecture suggestive list of instructional options; from
Teaching, Learning and Technology at SUNY
Teaching Goals
Inventory The Center for Teaching at The University of Iowa is pleased
to bring the Teaching Goals Inventory to you online.
Teaching Bibliography from the Center for Teaching and Learning at
Electronic
Archive for teaching the American Literatures The Electronic Archives
are created and maintained by the Center for Electronic Projects in American
Culture Studies (CEPACS) at
NCTE homepage National Council of
Teachers of English
Teaching Literature
Bibliography Linked from the syllabus of a (far more structured)
Teaching Literature class by Prof. Byron Hawk at
Teaching Temperaments:
On learning Styles: From the Georgia State Master Teacher Program, this
site offers information on how temperaments inform different learning styles
and strategies for adopting teaching methods to meet these different styles.
Jungian Typology
test: an online test from a site
entitled Humanmetrics.
Kiersey Temperament
Sorter: Commercial website that provides updates Kiersey's Please
Understand Me, including "A Modern Guide to Temperaments."
There are numerous resources available, but the list above will get you
started. Now, go out and
explore!
References
Abelmann, Charles, et al. “When
Accountability Knocks, Will Anyone Answer?”
Consortium for Policy Research in Education, 1999.
Allen, Janet. It's Never Too
Late: Leading Adolescents to Lifelong Literacy.
Appleman, Deborah.
Critical Encounters in High School English: Teaching Literary Theory to
Adolescents. Eds. Dorothy S.
Strickland and Celia Ganishi.
Briars, Diane J., and Lauren B. Resnick.
“Standards, Assessment--and What Else?
The Essential Elements of Standards-Based School Improvement.” :
Center for the Study of Evaluation,
Bruner, Jerome. Acts of
Meaning.
Bryk, Anthony S., Valerie E. Lee, and Peter B. Holland.
Burke, Jim. The English
Teacher’s Companion: A Complete Guide to Classroom, Curriculum, and the
Profession. 2nd
Burke, Jim.
Illuminating Texts: How to Teach Students to Read the World.
Burke, Jim. Reading
Reminders: Tool, Tips, and Techniques.
Christenbury, Leila. “Questioning.”
Making the Journey: Being and Becoming a Teacher of English
Language Arts.
Claggett, Fran. A Measure of
Success: From Assignment to Assessment in English Language Arts.
Coalition of Essential Schools:
http://www.essentialschools.org/aboutus/aboutus.html
Echevarria, Jona, and Anne Graves.
Sheltered Content Instruction: Teaching English-Language Learners
with Diverse Abilities.
Graph of professor and employer opinions of graduates' grammatical skill:
http://www.publicagenda.org/issues/angles_graph.cfm?issue_type=education&id=276&graph=pcc12.gif
Hewitt, Geof. A Protfolio
Primer: Teaching, Collecting, and Assessing Student Writing.
Hillocks, George Jr., and Michael W. Smith. "Grammar and Usage." Handbook
of Research on Teaching the English Language Arts. Ed. James Flood,
Julie M.Jensen, Diane Lapp, and James R. Squire.
Hillocks, George.
Research on Written Composition: New Directions for Teaching.
Hillocks, George. Teaching
Writing as Reflective Practice.
Jago, Carol. Cohesive
Writing: Why Concept Is Not Enough.
"Just for Fun: The Amazing and Incredible, Only-Slightly-Laughable
Politically Unassailable, PoMo English Title Generator."
http://www.brysons.net/generator.html
Johannessen, Larry R. “Teaching Thinking and Writing for a New Century.”
English Journal 90.6 (2001): 38-46.
Kahn, Elizabeth A., Carolyn Calhoun Walter, and Larry R. Johannessen.
Writing about Literature.
Keene, Ellin Oliver, and Susan Zimmerman.
Mosaic of Thought: Teaching Comprehension in a Reader's Workshop.
Kresty, Barbara, Susan O'Leary, and Dale Wortley.
You Can Make a Difference: A Teacher's Guide to Political Action.
Langer, Judith A.
Envisioning Literature: Literary
Understanding and Literature Instruction.
Langer, Judith A. “Excellence in English in Middle and High School:
How Teachers' Professional Lives Support Student Achievement.”
American Educational Research Journal 37.2 (2000): 397-439.
Langer, Judith A. “Succeeding against the Odds in English.” English
Journal 97.1 (2001): 37-42.
Levine, Mel. A Mind at a Time.
Madaus, George, and Marguerite Clarke.
The Adverse Impact of High Stakes Testing on Minority Students:
Evidence From 100 Years Of Test Data.
Presented at the High Stakes K-12 Testing Conference, Teachers
College,
NCTE standards:
http://www.ncte.org/standards/standards.shtml
Newmann, Fred M., R. A. Rutter, and M. S. Smith. “Organizational factors
that affect school sense of efficacy, community, and expectations.”
Sociology of Education 62 (1989): 221-238.
Olson, Carol Booth. The
Reading/Writing Connection: Strategies for Teaching and Learning in the
Secondary Classroom.
Orrill, Chandra Hawley.
“Learning Objects to Support Inquiry-Based, Online Learning.” The
Instructional Use of Learning Objects.
Ed. D. A. Wiley.
Rhodes, Lynn K., and Curt Dudley-Marling.
Readers with a Difference: A Holistic Approach to Teaching
Learning Disabled and Remedial Students.
Routman, Regie. Literacy at
the Crossroads: Critical Talk About
Sadowski, Michael. “Are High-Stakes Tests Worth the Wager?” Harvard
Education Letter, 2000.
http://www.edletter.org/past/issues/2000-so/tests.shtml
Schein, Edgar H.
Organizational Culture and Leadership.
Eds. Warren Bennis, Richard O. Mason and Ian I. Mitroff.
2nd ed.
Scholes, Robert. The
Protocols of
Shrofel,
Smagorinsky, Peter, Tom McCann, and Stephen Kern.
Explorations:
Introductory Activities for Literature and Composition, 7-12.
Smagorinsky, Peter, and Steven Gevinson.
Fostering the Reader's Response:
Rethinking the Literature Curriculum, Grades 7-12.
Spandel, Vicki, and Richard J. Stiggins.
Creating Writers: Linking Writing Assessment and Instruction.
Spandel, Vicki. Creating
Writing Through 6-Trait Writing Assessment and Instruction.
Strickland, Kathleen, and James Strickland.
Reflections on Assessment.
Thomas, P. L. “Standards, Standards Everywhere, and Not a Spot to Think.”
English Journal 91.1 (2001): 63-67.
Tovani, Cris. I Read It, But
I Don't Get It: Comprehension Strategies for Adolescent Readers.
Tucker, Marc S., and Judy B. Codding.
Standards for Our Schools: How to Set Them, Measure Them, and
Reach Them.
Vygotsky, L. S. Mind in
Society: The Development of
Higher Psychological Processes.
Weaver, Constance. Grammar for Teachers: Perspectives and Definitions.
Weaver, Constance.
Lessons
to Share on Teaching Grammar in Context.
Weaver, Constance. Teaching
Grammar in Context.
Wiggins, Grant. Educative
Assessment.
Wilhelm, Jeffrey D. Action
Strategies for Deepening Comprehension: Theory and Practice.
Wilhelm, Jeffrey D. "You
Gotta BE the Book": Teaching Engaged and Reflective
Zemelman, Steven, and Harvey Daniels.
Community of Writers: Teaching Writing in the Junior and Senior
High School.
Zmuda, Alison, and Mary Tomaino.
The Competent Classroom: Aligning High School Curriculum, Standards, and
Assessment.
Matrix: Alignment of Course Objectives
ENGL 4417/5417: Teaching English in High Schools
Dr. Phyllis Thompson
Course Objectives: |
NCTE |
NCATE |
1. Candidates will identify professional content standards and explain
how they relate to effective teaching. |
1.2, 3.7.1 |
1A, 1B, 1C, 1D |
2. Candidates will implement Standards, Competencies, and Objectives for
the English Language Arts curriculum. |
1.2, 2.7, 3.7.1 |
1A, 1B, 1D, 1E |
3. Candidates will articulate an informed perspective on issues of
professional concern and will practice professional conduct when working
with students, parents, colleagues, and administrators. |
2.5, 4.1.2.2 |
1A, 1C |
4. Candidates will expand their exposure to literature, which crosses
lines of culture, race, ethnicity, religion, class, sexual orientation,
age, gender, and genre, and investigate resources to identify authors,
teaching tools, and current scholarship. |
1.1, 1.2, 2.5, 2.6, 3.7.1, 3.5.1.1, 3.5.1.2, 3.5.1.3, 3.5.1.4, 3.5.1.5,
3.5.1.6 |
1A, 1C |
5. Candidates will understand the diversity of student learner types and
the relevance of cultural influences to learning styles. |
2.4, 2.6, 3.1.1, 3.1.4, 3.2.1, 4.2, 4.5, 4.11 |
1B, 1E, 4A |
6. Candidates will research and respond critically to primary and
secondary source materials. |
2.5, 3.2.2, 3.3.1, 3.3.3, 3.7.1, 4.1, 4.10 |
1A, 1C |
7. Candidates will learn about and practice strategies to involve
adolescents in reading, comprehending, and responding to literature. |
2.4, 3.1.2, 3.3.1, 3.3.2, 3.3.3, 4.2, 4.11 |
1B, 1E |
8. Candidates will learn about and practice strategies to involve
adolescents in writing as process. |
2..4, 3.1.2, 3.2.1, 3.2.2, 3.2.3, 3.2.4, 3.4.1, 3.4.2, 3.4.3, 4.2 |
1B, 1E |
9 Candidates will design an effective literature lesson (with assessment
instrument), which draws on a range of enrichment materials that will
engage students in active and authentic learning. |
3.1.2, 3.3.1, 3.3.2, 3.3.3, 4.1, 4.2, 4.11, 4.12, 4.12.1, |
1B, 1E |
10. Candidates will design an effective writing lesson (with assessment
instrument), which draws on a range of enrichment materials that will
engage students in active and authentic learning. |
2.4, 3.1.2, 3.2.1, 3.2.2, 3.2.3, 3.2.4, 3.4.1, 3.4.2, 3.4.3, 4.2, 4.1.2,
4.1.2.1 |
1B, 1E |
11. Candidates will examine their own literacy experiences and those of
others to understand more about how individuals acquire and develop
literacy and tastes for literature within social/cultural/familial
contexts. |
2.1, 2.2, 2.6, 2.7, 3.1.3, 3.1.4, 3.5.1.1, 3.5.1.3, 3.5.1.4,
|
1C, 4A |
12. Candidates will create a learning environment that is sensitive to
the needs of different learner types and fosters respect for individual
differences along lines of race, religion, ethnicity, culture, gender,
and sexual orientation. |
2.5, 2.6, 4.2, 4.3, 4.5 |
1E |
13. Candidates will use
technology and print/nonprint media to enhance instruction. |
3.2.5, 3.6.2, 3.6.3, 4.1.1, 4.6, 4.8 |
1B |
14. Candidates will define education and develop a personal philosophy
for teaching English Language Arts curriculum. |
2.6, 3.1.1, 3.2.4, 4.2, 4.5 |
1A, 1B, 1E |
15. Candidates will identify philosophical beliefs that underscore
pedagogical practices. |
2.5, 2.6, 3.7.1 |
1B, 4A, 1E |
16. Candidates will test their assumptions and skills about teaching and
reflect in writing on the strengths and weaknesses of those assumptions
and skills. |
1.2, 2.3, 5.1 |
1E, 3B |
17. Candidates will reflect on the effectiveness of their individual
lesson plans and unit plans (taking into consideration issues including,
but not limit to, assessment and evaluation, diversity, student learner
types, and classroom management) and make suggestions about ways in
which lessons and/or units could be improved. |
2.3, 3.4.1, 3.4.3, 4.1.2, 4.1.2.1, 4.1.2.2, 4.2, 4.3, 4.5 |
1E, 3B, 3C, 4A |
18. Candidates will produce: |
|
|
A. Course Rationale |
2.1, 4.1, 4.4 |
1A, 1B, 4A |
B. Teaching
Philosophy |
4.2, 4.3, 4.4, 4.9 |
1B, 4A |
C. Unit Schedule |
4.9 |
1C, 4A |
D. Daily Plans |
2.4, 2.6, 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, 4.5, 4.6, 4.7, 4.9, 4.10 |
1B, 1E, 4A |
E.
Evaluation/Assessment Plan(s) |
2.4, 4.2, 4.6, 4.8, 4.9, 4.10, 4.1.2, 4.1.2.1, 4.1.2.2 |
1E, 4A |
F. Resource List |
2.1.2, 2.2, 2.5, 4.1, 4.3, 4.4, 4.6 |
1A |
G. Reflection
Activity |
2.3 |
1E, 3B, 3C, 4A |
H. Teaching
Demonstration |
5.1, 5.2.1 |
4A |
I.
Presentations |
2.3, 3.2.3, 3.2.4, 3.6.3, 3.7.1, 3.7.2, 4.12.2, 5.2.2 |
5 |